It is not money that comes first in the “climate terror”. The struggle for power is in the first place. Five hundred prominent scientists from different countries, including Professor Guus Berkhout from the Netherlands, Professor Richard Lindzen (USA), Professor Ingemar Nordin (Sweden), Professor Alberto Prestininzi (Italy) and many others, wrote the letter addressed to the United Nations Secretary General, Antoniu Guterresha, the head of the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Commission on Climate Change, Patricia Espinosa Cantellano and the secretariat of the UNFCCC. In it, the scientists urged to stop politicizing the topic of ecology and speculating on it. In their address, the scientists say that there is no threatening situation related to climate change, as there are no prerequisites for panic or anxiety on this issue.
“The geological archive shows that the Earth’s climate changed while the planet existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The little ice age ended just recently, in 1850. Therefore, it is not surprising that we are now experiencing a period of warming ... The world has warmed less than half of the originally predicted level,” the statement says.
Scientists note the fact that the politicization of the environmental issue leads to the fact that huge amounts of money are being spent on allegedly combating the consequences of the "ecological catastrophe" associated with global warming. Of particular note is the “fight” against harmful carbon dioxide emissions of CO2, which is a huge expense.
"Climate models have many shortcomings and are not even remotely plausible as policy instruments. Moreover, they are likely to exaggerate the effects of greenhouse gases such as CO2. Also, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is important for all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, it landscapes the Earth: the additional presence of CO2 in the air contributed to the growth of world plant biomass. This is also good for agriculture, as increases yields worldwide. Nevertheless, measures to reduce CO2 emissions are as damaging as costly. For example, wind turbines kill birds and bats, and palm oil plantations destroy the biological diversity of rainforests, "scientists say.
In their letter, its signatories say that there are no statistics that would allow us to say that it is the so-called “Global warming” is the reason for the increase in the number of natural disasters on the planet, such as hurricanes, floods, droughts and other natural disasters, or makes them more frequent and called for the inclusion of a declaration on this issue, prepared by scientists, in the agenda of the upcoming session in New York.
“We also invite you to organize a constructive summit with us between world-class scientists on both sides of the climate debate in early 2020.”
Reading this address of pundits, I remembered how liberals scoffed at Putin's words about the electric power generators based on wind force, those windmills. Remember? But now it turned out that the world leading scientists in the study of the Earth’s climate, repeat our president's fears.
Personally, everything is clear to me in this situation. There is a cut in the UN budget. There are financial flows, we must saddle them, but why not use such a topic? Let's run the girl Gretta to the UN rostrum, she will tug the heartstrings and the UN will make the next decision that it is necessary to fight global warming and allocate crazy money for this fight. It will be a struggle with windmills in fact. But the funds will be mastered.
But even it is not money that comes first in the “climate terror”. In the first place is the struggle for power, waged by liberal globalists, but it is glad about that in the same United States, many people well understand who and what they are trying to sell under the guise of a struggle for the environment, which Trump supporters are not embarrassed to write about.